TOEFL Essay Topic 138 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The issue of whether being a member of a group is better than being the leader of a group arouses
The issue of whether being a member of a group is better than being the leader of a group arouses much controversy among people with different perspectives and backgrounds. Some people believe the statement is legitimate, because being a member has less responsibilities for the flaw. On the other hand, some people claim being a leader can maximize the person`s ability. As far as I am concerned, the issue should be considered in different situations.
In the first place, considering individual`s characters, I believe someone is not suitable for some leader positions such as a chairman. For example, a technical worker would be promoted as a master of manufacture department according to his good performance. The fact that he is a good worker does not mean he would be also a good leader. If he lacks the skill of conmmunication, negotiation, and coherence which are known as the elemental and optimal characters for leadship, the failture of administation is easy to predict. To some people who are not suitable for leader, the statement that it is better to be a member than a leader is right.
In addition, leaders have more rights to reach the destination while they have more responsibilities for the failure.leader who is elected by the members advocates the group to win, to gain and to reach. Some people is satisfied with the success as a leader of team. Some people cannot suffer the stress as a master of a team. As a result, to different people the issue has different conclusions.
In the second place, both negative and positive effects among persons in society call for a balance in which there are both leaders and members. we need outstanding leaders as well as excellent members in our teams. In modern society, can you imagine the community where only leaders exit without the members? In some extents, to be a member is equal important to be a leader.
In sum, considering the aforementioned reasons, I believe that in respective situations there are repective conclusions accordiong to respective people. Simply to answer this quesion is easy to fall into extremeness and vulnerability.