GRE Essay Topic 786 - The following was published by a consumer protection agency. "Three years ago, So-Low launched a nationwide ad campaign, focusing heavily on sunny regions and distributing free sunglasses there. But although So-Low sunglasses cost less than higher-priced brands, they block a smaller proportion of the Sun's rays, including the type of rays known to damage the eyes even when the person wearing the sunglasses feels no discomfort. A recent study suggests that So-Low sunglasses can actually increase the risk of damage to people's eyes by creating a false sense of security. The study shows a sharp increase in the incidence of vision problems in the sunny regions over the past three years. These findings suggest that anyone concerned about eye damage from the Sun should avoid So-Low brand and instead either pay for higher-priced brands or wear no sunglasses at all. " Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
Pleasure boats or no pleasure boats? Score: 2.5 July 18th, 2008 by findscore.com
The authors claim that allowing pleasure boats would force the fishing boats out and neither would they contribute to the prosperity of Seatown is completely unjustified. The declining fish popu... Read more
So-Low sun glasses- a delusion Score: 4.5 March 12th, 2007 by findscore.com
The author strongly reproves wearing so-low sunglasses with some studies. Eventhough the cause and effect relationship seems plausible, a stint of fallacy wanders in the minds of the readers. In ot... Read more
Efficacy of Sun glasses for Protection Against Damaging Sun Score: 4.5 February 19th, 2007 by findscore.com
The argument is regarding the advocacy of wearing high priced band sun glasses to ensure total protection from Ultra violet rays and to avoid damage to people eyes, instead of wearing low brands, w... Read more