Show Essay by Topic


GRE Essay Topic 755 - The following appeared in a letter to an editor. "In many countries, wood is the primary fuel used for heating and cooking, but wood smoke can cause respiratory and eye problems, and extensive use of wood causes deforestation, a major environmental problem. In contrast, charcoal, made by partially burning wood in a controlled process, is a fuel that creates less smoke than wood does. Moreover, although charcoal costs slightly more than wood, less charcoal is needed to produce the same amount of heat. Therefore, people who use wood as their primary fuel can, without experiencing economic hardship, switch to charcoal and can thereby improve their health and preserve the environment. " Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.


The letter is seriously flawed because it makes dubious and unreliable assumptions. It claims that wood smoke may result in Score: 5.5 February 23rd, 2016 by findscore.com
The letter is seriously flawed because it makes dubious and unreliable assumptions. It claims that wood smoke may result in respiratory and eye ailments, and excessive use of wood can lead to the d... Read more
charcoal eassy Score: 4.5 August 5th, 2013 by findscore.com
Regarding this issue,the author of the argument claims that using charcoal can support to create the good environment and good healthy for residence but using wood can damage for the environ.The a... Read more
wood vs. charcoal Score: 4.5 April 23rd, 2011 by findscore.com
The conclusion of the above letter to an editor is as follows: By using charcoal as primary fuel, instead of wood, people can improve their health and preserve the environment. At first glance, th... Read more
=> 5 or 6 Essays, Click Here <=
The author concludes that people should use charcoal rather than wood as their primary fuel because charcoal produces less smoke which Score: 4.5 August 29th, 2010 by findscore.com
The author concludes that people should use charcoal rather than wood as their primary fuel because charcoal produces less smoke which causes eye and respiratory problems and is more energy-efficie... Read more
The given argument is not cogent. This is because it is not based on a report or study that supports Score: 4 December 9th, 2008 by findscore.com
The given argument is not cogent. This is because it is not based on a report or study that supports it, it does not mention what are the other fuels used and what is the capacity of using them as ... Read more
In this argument the arguer concludes that they should replace the wood with charcoal to improve their health and preserve Score: 4.5 August 27th, 2007 by findscore.com
In this argument the arguer concludes that they should replace the wood with charcoal to improve their health and preserve the environment. To illustrate his verdict the arguer cites that charcoal ... Read more
Wood Vs Gas Score: 4 May 28th, 2007 by findscore.com
The letter has been given in such a way that it advocates the usage of charcoal instead of wood. Therefore the imminent answer (or more tentative answer) would be to sort out the problem by supplan... Read more
Charcoal vs the wood for health and ennvironmental preservat Score: 4.5 March 4th, 2007 by findscore.com
The note suggests that people using the wood can make themselves healthy and preserve environment at the same time by switching over to charcoal. It also tells that the charcoal will be only as cos... Read more
=> 5 or 6 Essays, Click Here <=
The author concludes that people who use wood as fuel should switch to charcoal. This argument is not entirely logically Score: 4 January 29th, 2007 by findscore.com
The author concludes that people who use wood as fuel should switch to charcoal. This argument is not entirely logically convincing. It contains logical flaws and ignores certain critical assumptio... Read more

Leave a Comment