GMAT Essay Topic 430 - The following appeared in an article in a health and fitness magazine. "Laboratory studies show that Saluda Natural Spring Water contains several of the minerals necessary for good health and that it is completely free of bacteria. Residents of Saluda, the small town where the water is bottled, are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. Even though Saluda Natural Spring Water may seem expensive, drinking it instead of tap water is a wise investment in good health." Discuss how well reasoned . . . Etc.
Saluda natural spring water
In this argument the author concludes that drinking Saluda Natural Spring Water (SNSW) is preferable to drinking tap water. Three reasons are offered in support of this conclusion: SNSW contains several of the minerals necessary for good health, it is completely tree of bacteria, and residents of Saluda—the town where it is bottled—are hospitalized less frequently than the national average. This argument is unconvincing because it relies on a variety of dubious assumptions.
The first questionable assumption underlying this argument that tap water does not contain the minerals in question and is not completely free of bacteria. This assumption is not supported in the argument. If tap water is found to contain the same minerals and to be free of bacteria, the author’s conclusion is substantially undermined.
A second assumption of the argument is that the water residents of Saluda drink is the same as SNSW. Lacking evidence to the contrary, it is possible that Saluda is not the source of the bottled water but is merely the place where SNSW is bottled. No evidence is offered in the argument to dispute this possibility.
Finally, it is assumed without argument that the reason residents are hospitalized less frequently than the national average is that they drink SNSW. Again, no evidence is offered to support this assumption. Perhaps the residents are hospitalized less frequently because they are younger than the national average, because they are all vegetarians, or because they exercise daily. That is, there might be other reasons than the one cited to account for this disparity.
In conclusion, this is an unconvincing argument. To strengthen the conclusion that SNSW is more healthful than tap water, the author must provide evidence that tap water contains harmful bacteria not found in SNSW. Moreover, the author must demonstrate that the residents of Saluda regularly drink the same water as SNSW and that this is why they are hospitalized less frequently than the national average.
Under the same topic
In this argument author claims that restricting the water flow for the first three buildings in the has considerabily reduced the water useage and there by reducing the amount of money spent on water each month. He also plan to implement this chance for all the twelve building which would prince about more more reduction […]
The statement which is written in the Oak City Gazette,a local news paper that the membership in Oak City’s Civic Club is restricted for the people who live in Oak City is not entirely convincing.There are some logical flaws which prevent it from being more effective.The auther states that” Membership in Oak City’s Civic Club […]
Many natural resources are disappearing on our planet every day. One of the most important resources we are destroying is
Many natural resources are disappearing on our planet every day. One of the most important resources we are destroying is clean water. We must realize that clean water is indispensable to life. All animals and plants need clean water. Clean water also can keep people health. We all know there would be no life without […]