TOEFL

Kotaro

TOEFL Essay Topic 65 - Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

Author: Kotaro | Date: May 17, 2018 | Score:4 | => 5 or 6 Essays, Click Here <=

Kotaro

In general, people are attracted by a new, a modern thing. and it is natural for mayor to think that a city replace old, historic building with modern buildings. However, I disagree with this idea, and I believe that a city preserve its historic buildings since historic buildings themselves have the distinct value more than that of modern buildings.

The historic building itselfs is highly valuable for a toruism of a city. What people want to see in sightseeing is the culture of a city. Historic buildings themselves provide the tip of culture with tourist, and thus, they attract many tourist from all over the world. Kyoto, old capital city of Japan, for example, keeps a lot of its historic shine or temple. Kyoto attracts handreds of thousands tourist from world. The number of tourist of Kyoto is higher than that of Tokyo. The reason foreigner people want to go Kyoto is the availability of many historic building in Kyoto, which makes Kyoto one of the most profitable cities in Japan. It is easy to destory historic buildings, but it is almost impossible to revive the historic buildings. Thus, it is better for a city to preserve the historic buildings, which gives birthe the tremendous profits from toruism.

Some people point out that to keep old, historic building hinders the city from the development of transportation systems. The city, which has lots of historic buildings, can also develop its transportation systems. Kyoto, for instance, boasts its convenience of transportation systems thanks to the development of bus, or road train systems. You can go everywhere in Kyoto to ride bus or road train. Even old city can develop its convenient transportaion systems by keeping its historic buildings.

In conculusion, the availability of historic buildings gives the tremendous profits from toursim to the city. Therefore, I think that it is a better choice for city to keep historic buildings in the city




  • [Score & Analysis]


    Under the same topic

    Destroy or conserve Score: 4.5 May 25th, 2018 by Wallis Yu
    Filled with countless kinds of modern building, the city transformed from a beautiful and simple city to a modern but uncomfortable one. Thus, in my opinion, I prefer buildings and house with tradi...Read more
    Friends’ and colleagues’ recommendations are more influential Score: 5 May 9th, 2018 by KONGBO
    When people purchase an expensive good, they may chew over their decision again and again in order to make sure it is economical and worthy. In this process, people may be influenced by some inform...Read more
    Demolish old ones Score: 4.5 May 6th, 2018 by hi
    There are many people who want to preserve old buildings of their city. Also, there are many that do not think so. In my opinion, it is better to demolish old, historic buildings and restore modern...Read more
    Should the government preserve old buildings or build new ones? Score: 4 February 7th, 2018 by Abby
    People often hold different perspective on whether the government should preserve old buildings or build new ones. Based on my personal experience and observation of life, I strongly argued that th...Read more
    Campus life Score: 5 November 18th, 2017 by fas
    Almost all students spend a lot of time on campus, and therefore the issues that affect their campus lives is critical. Some people might think that universities should hire experts to make these c...Read more
    Universities should hire experts Score: 4 September 7th, 2017 by Jenny
    Some people believe that Universities should hire experts to make important decisions for school. In my opinion, students are the most important part of people in schools, so they should take part ...Read more

    Leave a Comment