TOEFL Essay Topic 154 - In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is a good rule or a bad rule? Use specific reasons and details to support your position.
It is indeed true that smoking is restricted nowadays in many public areas and office buildings. This is done because
It is indeed true that smoking is restricted nowadays in many public areas and office buildings. This is done because smoking is damaging for the person that willingly smokes but it is also very bad for passive smokers who unwillingly inhale the smoke. This is way people should be free to smoke if they want but this should be done not on behalf of other people.
In my country Greece, the rate of people who smokes is very high. Recently the government has passed a law in the parliament which restricts smoking in many public areas and office buildings as well. This has caused a lot of frustration among smokers who are a relatively big proportion of the population. On the other hand non-smokers feel that at last they have the right to live a good healthy life without cancer problems.
In my opinion restricting smoking in public places is a good practice for reducing smoking in general. People cannot avoid public places therefore smokers will have to reduce their bad habit not being able to do otherwise. This means that the new law is good not only for non-smokers who will no longer have to put up with those who smoke but it is also a way of reducing smoking to those who did smoke before in public places.
I therefore believe that since smoking is known that can cause very serious health damage such as lung cancer which leads to slow and painful death, it is a good practice to no longer allow people to smoke in public places and office buildings. On the other hand I feel that since smoking in general is not against the law, smokers do have some rights that we should take into account. What I mean by this is that there should be restricted areas for example in restaurants where smokers can enjoy their unhealthy habit without bothering other people.
As a conclusion I would like to say that it would be best for all if smoking was not unhealthy, but since this is just impossible we should at least protect those who unwillingly suffer the results of smoking without even â€œenjoyingâ€ the cause.
Under the same topic
The passage of reasoning is that the imposition of strict safety codes on public buildings inhibits the evolution of architectural
The passage of reasoning is that the imposition of strict safety codes on public buildings inhibits the evolution of architectural styles and design. It is because they discourage technological innovation within the building industry. In the first place, the author’s conclusion goes beyond the evidence presented. The evidence cited pertains only to the construction of […]
there is couple of thing i like to change in my hometown such as air and noise pollution problem, high price of housing and too hot in the city urban. however the primary thing i like to change in those thing is public transportation problem. there is some point that i consider the public transportation […]
The topic of whether people are allowed to smoke in public places and office buildings can be approached from several different angles due to its complexity. Some people tend to agree with that people are allowed to smoke in public places and office buildings while other people would think it should be restricted. However, I […]