GRE Essay Topic 785 - The following proposal was raised at a meeting of the Franklin City Council. "Franklin Airport, which is on a bay, is notorious for flight delays. The airport management wants to build new runways to increase capacity but can only do so by filling in 900 acres of the bay. The Bay Coalition organization objects that filling in the bay will disrupt tidal patterns and harm wildlife. But the airport says that if it is permitted to build its new runways, it will fund the restoration of 1,000 acres of wetlands in areas of the bay that have previously been damaged by industrialization. This plan should be adopted, for it is necessary to reduce the flight delays, and the wetlands restoration part of the plan ensures that the bay's environment will actually be helped rather than hurt. " Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument.
Author: RishiDS | Date: December 16, 2015 | Score:4.5 | => 5 or 6 Essays, Click Here <=
The argument makes a number of assumptions regarding the notoriety of the Franklin airport for its delay. The author suggests that the delays are being caused because of less area under the airport authority. For this the authority has taken permissions for the filling of the bay nearby airport. This is to increase the capacity of the airport which in turn might make flight aviation faster. The evidence in the favor of argument is unsubstantiated and relies on specious reasoning and disingenuous assumptions. The following are the points the author should take care of while making such statements.
Firstly, the author doesn’t suggest a solid proof regarding the delays of the flights. There might be instances such as the flights might get delayed because of its arrival estimated time. The implication is that there might be some problems before the air traffic lets the flight to land on the Franklin airport. Moreover, there might be possibility that the flights might be delayed because of severe climate which prevails over the region all over the year. Thus the author should give some reason before suggesting such statements.
Secondly, if the airport authority is deciding to fill the 900 acres of area on the bay and the Bay Coalition is suggesting some ambiguous damage generally causing tidal changes, then the airport authority should make a note of it. Instead of giving statements as of they have taken the permissions for filling up the bay and neglecting the consequences might actually lead to some disastrous incident.
The authority can consider some alternative to develop the airport in some other direction.
However, if the airport develops the wetland area of the bay, it is unwarranted that the cause might help. On the contrary, the possibility of developing the wetlands might turn into inconsequential action. After spending the money also what if the project turns nugatory? The airport authority should provide some evidences regarding the positive outcome of the project. Rater, some case study would be helpful in this matter.
If the above assumptions can not hold true, the argument falls apart. The author should give some proof regarding the actions the authority is trying to take to increase its capacity that will surely and effectively lead to proper solution of the problem. Such unsubstantiated statements might lead to the failure and turning up to some newer problems.