TOEFL Essay Topic 138 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
According to my life experiences and my understanding of the crucial traits that a leader should possesses, I definitely disagree that it is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. In fact, being a member of a group might be much easier, however, being a leader of a gro...
This essay has been rated a score of 5. Essays in this score category are paid content. Please Register to gain access to this essay.
Under the same topic
When it comes to the issue the importance maintaining the old building, some people suggest that it is a necessity to destroy them for building a new building. However, others have the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the former point carries more weight. I take this position on account for the following reasons.
The first and most important reason is that, in the most cases, you have to sacrifice some things for gaining both the progress and welfare. Definitely, people tend to have access more facilities like library, parks, or even soccer fields, but the lack of the land always is a big problem for building these. It would be prudent to destroy old buildings and use their land for expanding facilities, which assists people to have comfort life. I think that a small example could give some light to this matter. Innovation paper was a great human beings' achievement, while it had expanded the deforestation. In fact, human progress has always been associated with removing and creating new things.
There is also a subtle point that we must consider. Nowadays, the unemployment issue is a trouble crisis for plenty of young people, so that we need more businesses. In this way, establishing new building such as movie theaters, restaurants, shopping centers, or even factories instead of old building could be a proper solution. In the one hand, local government does not have to allocate budget for protecting of these buildings, and they could more focus on the employment issue, or improving the city condition. On the other hand, from the economical angle, old buildings usually are located in the center of the city, where are suitable places for commercial activities. Overall, the biggest advantage of replacing old buildings with new building lies in the fact that brings more job opportunities, as well as help people to have a better economic condition.
Taking into account all of these factors, we may reach the conclusion that destroying old buildings obviously allow us to have access more facilities and career opportunities. Of course, as an English proverb goes â€œcoin has two sides,â€ those who take the opposite view are partly reasonable that old buildings are pieces of people history, and they are memorable places for many people. Nonetheless, I think that its benefits outweigh dangers. Last but not least, let us hope people understand that we are living in the 21st century, and we could not stay in the past.Read more